Skip to content
Give
← All Reviews
WHERE TO WATCH
MOVIE REVIEW

FOOD, INC.

A well-made, one-sided food documentary best watched at home by adults.

2009PG94 minutesMagnolia PicturesDocumentary
Wait for home — adults only.
ENTERTAINMENT QUALITY ★★★★ 2 / 4 Eye-opening, but one-sided and contradictory.
FAMILY CONTENT Caution −2 on the +4 to −4 scale Caution for discerning adults; not for children or young teens.
CONTENT LEVELS NONE → HEAVY
Language None
Violence Moderate
Sex None
Nudity None
BEST FOR Discerning adults interested in food production and public policy.
NOT FOR Children, young teens, or squeamish viewers.
CONTENT IN ONE LINE Strong depictions of animals being killed, graphic attention to animal feces, a one-sided presentation, and at least five references to evolution.
SHARE f 𝕏 ✉ ⧉

Should You Watch It?

FOOD, INC. is well made and likely to generate discussion. Its charts and graphs communicate data effectively, and its examination of food production, big business, regulation, and consumer choices can prompt serious questions about what you buy and eat.

But the documentary presents its case unevenly. It promotes organic and locally grown food while offering little opposing evidence. It also contains strong depictions of chickens and chicks being killed and cows being slaughtered, along with considerable attention to animal feces. Its references to evolution further strengthen its humanist worldview.

The film has enough value for discerning adults who want to discuss its arguments, but its content and one-sidedness make a theater outing unwise. Watch it at home, if at all, where you can control the experience.

The Story

NO SPOILERS — WE KEEP THE SURPRISES

This documentary examines how food is produced in modern America and investigates the relationship between agriculture, big business, government regulation, and consumers.

It considers fast food, mass production, corn subsidies, food safety, animal processing, and the movement toward organic and locally grown products. The film ultimately argues that consumers can influence the food system through what they choose to buy.

Is It Any Good?

Two stars means FOOD, INC. is worth discussing but falls short as a balanced documentary. Its production values are high, and its charts and graphs work well to communicate the information being presented. The film is also eye-opening in the subjects it examines.

Its central weakness is its lopsided approach. It never seriously offers an opposing viewpoint, and its arguments about regulation, government involvement, and food production are somewhat contradictory. The documentary raises important questions, but it does not fully test its own conclusions.

The Worldview

FOOD, INC. presents a humanist worldview strengthened by at least five references to evolution. On-camera experts describe what animals are supposed to eat, but the film attributes that system to a mindless process rather than to a personal, divine Creator. The documentary also includes politically correct elements that criticize capitalism and favor increased government regulation, while ending with a free-market solution based on consumer demand.

The film exalts local and organic food production, consumer influence, and closer scrutiny of the food industry. It criticizes the fast food industry, agricultural business practices, and alleged conflicts of interest involving government regulatory agencies. However, it does not seriously present opposing viewpoints, including arguments about modern food production or the effects of regulation.

A biblical view can share concern for wise stewardship, truthful business practices, and care for what people consume. But Scripture identifies God—not evolution—as the Creator of humanity and the world: “So God created man in his own image” (Genesis 1:27).

Movieguide® worldview codes: HHH, EvEvEv, PCPC, ACapACap, So, Co, CapCap, VV, MM — preserved for our database, awards research and the annual Report to the Entertainment Industry. What the codes mean →

The Content Guide

The specifics — spoilers included by nature — so you can judge for your own family.

Content Summary

Very strong humanist worldview with numerous (at least five) references to evolution, plus strong politically correct elements that are anti-capitalist (especially against the fast food industry) and pro-socialist regulations with light Communist overtones as well as some pro-capitalist elements, however, promoting the increased production, distribution and consumption of healthier and organic foods from local sources; no foul language; some strong depictions of chickens and chicks being killed and cows being slaughtered; no sexual content; no nudity; no alcohol; no smoking or drugs; and, movie presents a lopsided view and alleges conflicts of interest.

Talk About It

Questions for the drive home, the dinner table, or the youth group.

01

How should Christians think about the responsibility of businesses, governments, and consumers in producing and buying food?

Proverbs 11:1 · Micah 6:8
02

The documentary attributes the design of animals and their diets to evolution. What does the Bible say about God’s role as Creator?

Genesis 1:27 · Psalm 24:1
03

How can you evaluate a persuasive argument when it does not present an opposing viewpoint?

Proverbs 18:17 · Acts 17:11
04

What responsibilities do people have toward animals and the resources God has entrusted to them?

Genesis 1:28 · Proverbs 12:10

The Final Word

FOOD, INC. is an eye-opening but one-sided documentary with strong depictions of animals being processed for food and a humanist worldview. Its production values and discussion potential are best experienced at home, by discerning adults—not children or young teens. Our answer is WAIT FOR HOME — ADULTS ONLY. For other choices, see.

THE VERDICT Wait for home — adults only.
WHERE TO WATCH Planning family movie night instead? Start with this week’s family-friendly picks →

More Movies Like This

Browse All Reviews →

Family-Friendly Alternatives